PDA

View Full Version : Don't do it HaLoites


Debit One
01-01-2010, 09:53 AM
Don't be the DB who calls this year "twenty ten." Don't make me fight you. If you weren't walking around calling last year "twenty oh nine" you cannot call this "twenty ten."

It is "two thousand ten."

Especially you, Taw.

newsbreaker
01-01-2010, 09:55 AM
My resolution for 2010 is to listen to Debit. He is a model for us all.

TH1974
01-01-2010, 10:03 AM
+1

MikeyJoe
01-01-2010, 10:06 AM
Why? Did you call 1999 the year "one thousand, nine hundred ninety nine"?

I haven't decided yet how I'll say it, but it appears to me that it should be dictated by what is the easiest to say, not what you called the last decade.

Mo T
01-01-2010, 10:11 AM
It's the year of the Tiger.

L. Wade Childress
01-01-2010, 10:17 AM
no way, twenty-ten is way better and much more efficient. plus ive been doing it for years and cant change now.

JasperDeKimmel
01-01-2010, 10:18 AM
It's 1431, infidels.

Iza
01-01-2010, 10:29 AM
I'm pretty sure the framers had this argument.

Adams: Seventeen Seventy-Six!
Jefferson: That's gay. Seventeen hundred and seventy-six!
Franklin: Whoa. I thought they'd found out about me for a second.

SL
01-01-2010, 10:36 AM
Personally, I prefer "The year of our Lord, two thousand ten". I will be using it in all of my correspondence.

mobyditch
01-01-2010, 10:47 AM
no way, twenty-ten is way better and much more efficient. plus ive been doing it for years and cant change now.

+1

Iza
01-01-2010, 11:06 AM
Personally, I prefer "The year of our Lord, two thousand ten". I will be using it in all of my correspondence.

I like this.

Mr. Hawk
01-01-2010, 11:08 AM
I had already decided to go with twenty ten, and let's face it, I'm a trendsetter.

castichawk24
01-01-2010, 11:17 AM
I had already decided to go with twenty ten, and let's face it, I'm a trendsetter.


I hadn't decided..........

Until now.....

twenty ten it is.

Debit One
01-01-2010, 11:52 AM
no way, twenty-ten is way better and much more efficient. plus ive been doing it for years and cant change now.

More efficient is the standard?

It would be more efficient to speak in text language, but do we do that?

Do you say LOL? Do you say BRB?

Two thousand ten. Learn it, and love it.

Kerky
01-01-2010, 12:14 PM
I dare say that the great majority if not all of the 20th century was referred to in "nineteen" vernacular. Why not the 21st century? I have actually been waiting for this moment, while getting out of the awkward double zero decade to begin the "twenties".

Costanza
01-01-2010, 12:19 PM
I am in the 2 thousand 10 camp. Cant get myself to say 20-10.

danish_hawkeye
01-01-2010, 12:51 PM
either is better than the idiots that say two thousand AND ten

Corporate Raider
01-01-2010, 12:53 PM
two-oh-one-oh

Sambud
01-01-2010, 01:06 PM
Quite simply it will oh-ten.

ThadHawk
01-01-2010, 01:51 PM
no way, twenty-ten is way better and much more efficient. plus ive been doing it for years and cant change now.

More efficient is the standard?

It would be more efficient to speak in text language, but do we do that?

Do you say LOL? Do you say BRB?

Two thousand ten. Learn it, and love it.

How on earth would LOL be more efficient than laugh out loud? 3 syllables for each. Same for BRB. Pretty weak argument.

MikeyJoe
01-01-2010, 08:33 PM
either is better than the idiots that say two thousand AND ten
It's the year 2,000.10.

DGHawk
01-01-2010, 08:38 PM
[QUOTE=MikeyJoe;868107]Why? Did you call 1999 the year "one thousand, nine hundred ninety nine"?

QUOTE]


That's some pwnage there.

L. Wade Childress
01-01-2010, 08:56 PM
no way, twenty-ten is way better and much more efficient. plus ive been doing it for years and cant change now.

More efficient is the standard?

It would be more efficient to speak in text language, but do we do that?

Do you say LOL? Do you say BRB?

Two thousand ten. Learn it, and love it.

uh, no...i laugh out loud and return to my previous spot within a reasonable amount of time.