Shawneemicks
Has said plenty of things dumber than this
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2012
- Messages
- 14,316
- Reaction score
- 9,071
I don't disagree but it will happen.The worst thing the fans can do is boo. It would just make Kirk stiffen his neck more.
I don't disagree but it will happen.The worst thing the fans can do is boo. It would just make Kirk stiffen his neck more.
Which is too bad.Poor Jake is going to get crushed in the cross fire.
Kirk makes personnel decisions like a guy who has millions in the bank and a contract that guarantees him millions more.I'm telling ya, Kirk is more aware these days with guys like Brian and white on staff. He is trolling us. I'm not kidding.
He won't piss his pants. That's the problem. Jake is a perfectly fine quarterback. He's not going to be shitty enough for Kirk to be forced to make the switch if he doesn't want to.It's not who starts rather who ends. Kirk will give Jake every chance to keep his starting job and Jake will fail. He will either piss his pants or get "injured". I have no doubt in my mind Beathard will play a bunch this year and all (barring injury) of 2015 and probably 2016. Again, I like Jake just not as the starter.
I don't disagree but it will happen.
Kirk has already made the switch. Jake could have played vs pitt and he could have played last week.He won't piss his pants. That's the problem. Jake is a perfectly fine quarterback. He's not going to be shitty enough for Kirk to be forced to make the switch if he doesn't want to.
They fucking booed the team off the field at halftime of the UNI game. They booed during the Ball State game. They booed during the Iowa State game. If Rudock comes out and doesn't do anything the first few series and Indiana gets a lead, the boos will fucking rain down.I don't think they will boo. It will just be boring Kinnick like it was the first three home games. Think they would have an easier time unloading those 4k available tickets for each of the remaining games if Beathard was named the starter. Based solely on raised interest level.
We all have pretty much said Jake is a good QB, but not for this team. It isn't that Beathard is all that great yet, but he is good and the right person to help this team.I think that's a fair point, Howler. Jake isn't bad - and if last Saturday showed us everything, he's not the critical cog holding back the high powered Greg Davis offense.
He's just not all that good, either.
Why is KF comparing, even if implicitly, '13 Rudock to '14 Beathard?
CJ rescued the Pitt game and played very well in his first start on the road. Jake has looked pedestrian in Ball St and UNI, and downright limited in the ISU game.
You're going to halt the momentum the clearly better QB built up over weeks 4 and 5? So Stooooooooooooopid.
Lol right. Because I didn't say the same thing last week and it played out exactly as I predicted.L Wade with the boring contrarian act again.
I don't disagree. I'd rather see more of CJ too. I'm just being pessimistic about the overall offensive philosophy.We all have pretty much said Jake is a good QB, but not for this team. It isn't that Beathard is all that great yet, but he is good and the right person to help this team.
We're gonna disagree on this one.I don't think they will boo. It will just be boring Kinnick like it was the first three home games. Think they would have an easier time unloading those 4k available tickets for each of the remaining games if Beathard was named the starter. Based solely on raised interest level.
Davis mentioned in his interview that it was great Iowa had a certain number of "explosives" in the Purdue game. i.e. pass plays of over 16 yards, rushes over 12. Say what you will, but I see that as a reasonable benchmark for success for this team, yet Jake will almost certainly not meet those numbers moving forward.I think that's a fair point, Howler. Jake isn't bad - and if last Saturday showed us everything, he's not the critical cog holding back the high powered Greg Davis offense.
He's just not all that good, either.
I think attendance will be better than you think. It will be Homecoming and the only home game in October.Attendance won't be great, and if Jake struggles early, the fans will howl. Which, again, sucks for everyone. Jake will have missed a game and a half, plus an off week, and will likely start slowly- plus Iowa's offense is shitty to begin with.
You have never been more right.I would like to revise what I said above, and that is the boos won't likely come in the first half. I have every reason to believe that you will see something similar to the Ball State game when they gave Rudock the first series and then brought in Beathard the next series. They will likely be smart enough to realize they need to give him a series in the 2nd quarter as well.
Where the real fun will start is after halftime when Ferentz tends to turtle up. I could see him pulling a Pitt 2008 and sticking with one guy no matter how the game is going.
This is the fucking worst all the way around. He really goes out of his way to make the worst possible decisions sometimes. I would also be shocked if he has the balls to play both of them on the road at Maryland. He could barely bring himself to give him a single series in the Ball State game at home.
He really is a dumb fuck. The right decision all the way around was to stick with Beathard and then he would be free to go with Rudock if he sucked. He would have protected Rudock, had the upper hand with fans and stayed with the hot hand while letting Rudock fully heal. Fucking idiot.
I said that during chat as well. You have the best left tackle in college football and a pretty good young guard on the left side and you choose to run over and over right behind a struggling right guard who is playing like shit.I'm still pissed at how much Iowa ran right and up the fucking middle on Saturday. I don't give a shit if Scherff isn't 100%.
Fuck this. Turning this into some "CJ has earned the right to play a little too" bullshit is inexcusable.It's not who starts rather who ends. Kirk will give Jake every chance to keep his starting job and Jake will fail. He will either piss his pants or get "injured". I have no doubt in my mind Beathard will play a bunch this year and all (barring injury) of 2015 and probably 2016. Again, I like Jake just not as the starter.
There's a difference between booing the coaching at the end of the half and booing the team off the field. I was there, it wasn't THAT bad.They fucking booed the team off the field at halftime of the UNI game. They booed during the Ball State game. They booed during the Iowa State game. If Rudock comes out and doesn't do anything the first few series and Indiana gets a lead, the boos will fucking rain down.
It is pretty much a fact at this point Joe Fan wants Beathard. They see him as a savior of the boring fucking home games they have been subjected to for 3 years. He went into the Pitt game and saved it and played well enough at Purdue in their eyes. Now it comes out that Ferentz has gone against all logic and thrown up the middle finger at them in their view.
The boos will flow like cheap beer at Kinnick if this doesn't go perfectly for Rudock.
I voted already that Rudock would crack.They'll bounce around for a few weeks then settle on CJ. Also, Doug will vote at the end of the year and be right!
It's called "being pretty much full of shit". Of course there are inconsistencies in their message.It is sorta interesting Kirk and GDGD don't seem to be 100% on the same page. Will Kirk pull back media access to GDGD?
I don't actually think this is more important because they are stubborn dumbfucks and it wouldn't do any good other than identify the need to "execute".More important than who the QB is would be some self scouting by the offensive coaches during this bye week.
That he has Ebola?I'm clinging to the hope that L Wade is right.
You are probably right but I need to cling to some hope.I don't actually think this is more important because they are stubborn dumbfucks and it would do any good other than identify the need to "execute".