Loved and Defended The Criminal Until the Bitter End
- Sep 21, 2009
- Reaction score
I've never argued against this fact. You guys were just making yourself crazy by trying to use logic to explain why Rudock wasn't playing last year. All I ever said last year was that Rudock was going to be the starter this year.You gotta admit there was really no reason to not play Rudock at certain times last year. If he truly is/was the 2nd best QB on the team, it's idiotic. There were plenty of times where he wouldn't have just had to hand off to run out the clock and could have actually gotten some experience. It obviously wouldn't have been against a D that was going balls out, but it also wouldn't have been against the same D he saw every day in practice. When every single other D1 program has played more than 1 QB by week 6 or so (whenever that became official), then something doesn't quite make sense.No way Rudock starts this year. He wasn't even good enough to play last year.
We've been through all this before. I was honestly hoping that one of the redshirts was that much better because then not playing him would have at least made a little sense. I'm no chopsy, but Rudock still being #1 this year makes last year mind bottling.
And 94 is a Neanderthal.