Fritz Fequiere
Has a Master's from ISU worth millions
- Joined
- May 15, 2014
- Messages
- 1,887
- Reaction score
- -1,373
My degree from ISU is quite literally worth millions.Disagree.
My degree from ISU is quite literally worth millions.Disagree.
I'll give you the five bucks I have in my wallet so I can wipe my ass with it. Final offer.My degree from ISU is quite literally worth millions.
Bows, I suspect.Millions of what?
My degree from ISU is quite literally worth millions.
You thon of a bitch.You read everything with a lisp.
Can we get an addendum to that tagline?My degree from ISU is quite literally worth millions.
Coff Jr. welcome to HaLo!My degree from ISU is quite literally worth millions.
Schrute Bucks.Millions of what?
Bobby Hansen also liked this tweet:The first half was as bored as I can remember being recently watching a basketball game. Their style of play is an affront to the game itself. It sucks.
I mean it’s objectively false so...Hey man I wasn’t the one who brought up my going to ISU. There’s obviously a reason I did.
They should probably just give the free throws, but then give the ball back to whoever had it when they stopped the play. That's essentially how it worked for the technical. It was Iowa's ball after a Wisconsin score. Luka gets the T, Wisconsin gets 2 FT's, but then it's Iowa's ball. I'm assuming it was all called correctly last night (per the current rules), but those rules seem inconsistent.Basket counted because the foul wasn't whistled live. They assessed it on a dead ball after video review. It's kind of a weird rule, but that's how it works. But it would be more weird to rewind the clock and undo everything that had happened after a review. What if the dead ball hadn't come until Wisconsin had a possession and both teams had scored? Do you add 50 seconds back to the clock and take both baskets back?
Never been a lounge member but I can imagine myself thinking tucker would be a good pro.Fritz were you the same guy that I used to argue with in the lounge on hawkeyereport after you claimed Alondo Tucker would be a great NBA player?
Chizik coins.Millions of what?
A flagrant and technical are not the same thing though. A flagrant is a dirty play that should be more severe than telling the ref what you did to his mother.They should probably just give the free throws, but then give the ball back to whoever had it when they stopped the play. That's essentially how it worked for the technical. It was Iowa's ball after a Wisconsin score. Luka gets the T, Wisconsin gets 2 FT's, but then it's Iowa's ball. I'm assuming it was all called correctly last night (per the current rules), but those rules seem inconsistent.
The difference is flagrant vs. technical. By rule a flagrant is 2 shots + the ball. If they had assessed a technical Wisconsin would have retained possession.They should probably just give the free throws, but then give the ball back to whoever had it when they stopped the play. That's essentially how it worked for the technical. It was Iowa's ball after a Wisconsin score. Luka gets the T, Wisconsin gets 2 FT's, but then it's Iowa's ball. I'm assuming it was all called correctly last night (per the current rules), but those rules seem inconsistent.
One is a flagrant, dirty play and one was Luka yelling at a Wisconsin turd. There's a difference and I have no problem with being awarded the ball because of an intentionally dirty play that could hurt a player. There's a difference. Where it gets murky is the subjectivity of what is the degree of how dirty/ flagrant a play actually is. That was dirty.They should probably just give the free throws, but then give the ball back to whoever had it when they stopped the play. That's essentially how it worked for the technical. It was Iowa's ball after a Wisconsin score. Luka gets the T, Wisconsin gets 2 FT's, but then it's Iowa's ball. I'm assuming it was all called correctly last night (per the current rules), but those rules seem inconsistent.
when Luca got that t, I was worried Wisconsin was going to make two free throws then get the ball back with 2.5 seconds left and a chance to hit a 3 for the tieThey should probably just give the free throws, but then give the ball back to whoever had it when they stopped the play. That's essentially how it worked for the technical. It was Iowa's ball after a Wisconsin score. Luka gets the T, Wisconsin gets 2 FT's, but then it's Iowa's ball. I'm assuming it was all called correctly last night (per the current rules), but those rules seem inconsistent.
It was a cheap shot, and it isn't the first time Davison has done it.One is a flagrant, dirty play and one was Luka yelling at a Wisconsin turd. There's a difference and I have no problem with being awarded the ball because of an intentionally dirty play that could hurt a player. There's a difference. Where it gets murky is the subjectivity of what is the degree of how dirty/ flagrant a play actually is. That was dirty.
I was saying last night that I cannot imagine someone that has played the game all their life choosing to go somewhere to play that style of basketball. It has to be so boring and awful.Bobby Hansen also liked this tweet:
Kobe King came to that realization before the game.I was saying last night that I cannot imagine someone that has played the game all their life choosing to go somewhere to play that style of basketball. It has to be so boring and awful.
That move was sassy as fuck.The play down the stretch where Reuvers tried to contest Toussaint at the rim, and Toussaint finished through him for the and one and knocked him on his ass...whew boy. Talk about making a guy rock hard...
A flagrant and technical are not the same thing though. A flagrant is a dirty play that should be more severe than telling the ref what you did to his mother.
The difference is flagrant vs. technical. By rule a flagrant is 2 shots + the ball. If they had assessed a technical Wisconsin would have retained possession.
I realize they are different fouls and therefore call differently. I was just using the technical as an example.One is a flagrant, dirty play and one was Luka yelling at a Wisconsin turd. There's a difference and I have no problem with being awarded the ball because of an intentionally dirty play that could hurt a player. There's a difference. Where it gets murky is the subjectivity of what is the degree of how dirty/ flagrant a play actually is. That was dirty.
Doesn't it make you horny, sassy boy?Aaaaaand now it's a thing. Thanks Doug!
You'd be pissed if Connor gave a Wisconsin player a shot to the nuts?I realize they are different fouls and therefore call differently. I was just using the technical as an example.
I was referring more to the fact that Wisconsin was punished more because the refs didn't call it until the review (and after Wieskamps's bucket). If they call it right away, we get two shots and the ball. Since they called it on the review, we get Wieskamp's bucket, 2 shots and the ball. I was fine with it last night because fuck Wisconsin, but the rule is inconsistent. I'd be pissed if we were on the other side of it.
Yeah, I wasn't sure on that either. I think that use to be the rule (unless I'm just thinking of High School), but I prefer the current rule. A tech shouldn't be more punitive when you are on offense vs defense.when Luca got that t, I was worried Wisconsin was going to make two free throws then get the ball back with 2.5 seconds left and a chance to hit a 3 for the tie
It'd be fine as long as he got away with it.You'd be pissed if Connor gave a Wisconsin player a shot to the nuts?
Right but you get what I'm saying. If you have a player doing that, it's on the player, not the current rules. Don't want the other team to essentially get three consecutive possessions? Don't be a fuck.It'd be fine as long as he got away with it.
Great gif, Buffet. It fucking rips.I can't help but laugh every time I read the word "horny".
I get 2 Live Crew in my head.I can't help but laugh every time I read the word "horny" in the basketball forum.
That song also comes to mind when I hear that word.I get 2 Live Crew in my head.
Put your lips on my dick, and suck my asshole too
I'm a freak in heat, a dog without warning
My appetite is sex, 'cause me so horny
I get that. Davidson is the one person who could have prevented all of it, so no sympathy for him. I'm just saying the punishment should be the same whether the foul is called immediately or after a review. I realize it was technically the same punishment, but Iowa essentially got 2 extra points the way it went down.Right but you get what I'm saying. If you have a player doing that, it's on the player, not the current rules. Don't want the other team to essentially get three consecutive possessions? Don't be a fuck.
I keep trying to link a funny erection gif, and it keeps failing. But trust me, this makes me VERY hard.Waved goodbye to them after he hit the final two free throws. After the horn lets out a huge scream then told them to get the fuck out of his gym.
I get that. Davidson is the one person who could have prevented all of it, so no sympathy for him. I'm just saying the punishment should be the same whether the foul is called immediately or after a review. I realize it was technically the same punishment, but Iowa essentially got 2 extra points the way it went down.
SassyI keep trying to link a funny erection gif, and it keeps failing. But trust me, this makes me VERY hard.
Iowa did a good job of pushing the tempo enough and increasing the possessions in the game. Last night there were 70 possessions, exactly what Iowa averages for the year. Wisconsin averages just 62. In their upset over Maryland there were only 56. 70 is the high for the conference season this year. After a bad first 10 minutes, the Iowa offense kicked in despite the bad 3pt shooting, still averaged 0.97 points/possession.It really felt like, to me anyways, that Wisconsin played their best game, at their shitty ball deflating pace and we played like shit and still beat them at their own game. Plus our boys genuinely dislike those dorks. Good stuff.
I like seeing those advanced ORtg numbers, shows how far off Garza was from normal and really shows how shitty Connor / Kreiner / Bakari were.Iowa did a good job of pushing the tempo enough and increasing the possessions in the game. Last night there were 70 possessions, exactly what Iowa averages for the year. Wisconsin averages just 62. In their upset over Maryland there were only 56. 70 is the high for the conference season this year. After a bad first 10 minutes, the Iowa offense kicked in despite the bad 3pt shooting, still averaged 0.97 points/possession.
View attachment 16486
I thought Wisconsin defended him as well as they could. They are obviously a pretty disciplined and smart team and even though the crowd was screaming for fouls, they weren't fouling him.I just think we are accustomed to seeing Garza get everything to drop near the basket. Yesterday he had more than a couple dance around the rim and out. Still won.