**2025/2026 Bowl Games Thread**

Verbal

The Brave Little Poster
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
34,655
Reaction score
2,756
In the early 2000s, there were only like 25 total bowl games. 6-6 didn't guarantee you anything (e.g., 2007 Iowa Hawkeyes). They were all must-see tv, and in many ways, they were more fun than the system we have now.
 

newsbreaker

Got the top grade in his torts class
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
104,352
Reaction score
32,254
In the mid-late 90s I remember watching Michigan playing in the Citrus and Outback bowls and thinking “god damn, it would be nice to someday get to that level”.
Pre-playoff, the Citrus was the competitive equivalent of a first round playoff. Outback not a ton below.

Now Cirtus is the 4th or 5th place teams. It’s what an old Dec 29th bowl game would’ve been.
 

L. Wade Childress

Too stupid to be real
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
87,074
Reaction score
1,564
now that sports betting is legal, I’m sure that fewer football games is going to go over well.
 

Thrawn II

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2025
Messages
2,576
Reaction score
6,630
They still felt biggish until the last 10 years, I’d say. McCaffrey and Fournette opted out of 2016 bowls and that accelerated. For Iowa that was the awful third Outback v Florida in 13 years and hard to get excited for.

2017 and 2018 were fun for wins over fresh opponents. 2019 kinda felt like the last time a bowl felt heightened at all.

 

Thrawn II

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2025
Messages
2,576
Reaction score
6,630
Made me want to someday visit an exotic destination that had a Builder’s Square.
those mid-late 90s bowl sponsors really stick with you. Nokia had the Sugar Bowl, FedEx the Orange, Norwest the Sun, and Southwestern
bell the Cotton.

if it isn’t in the title now, I couldn’t tell you who sponsors what bowl today.
 

Shawneemicks

Has said plenty of things dumber than this
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
17,648
Reaction score
12,552
Iowa is actively looking at QBs in the portal.
That should probably tell us something
 

The Dad

Legitimately bald forever and stupid looking
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
45,894
Reaction score
62,550
Sam Leavett wanting to make a Big Douche redemption tour?
 

newsbreaker

Got the top grade in his torts class
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
104,352
Reaction score
32,254
those mid-late 90s bowl sponsors really stick with you. Nokia had the Sugar Bowl, FedEx the Orange, Norwest the Sun, and Southwestern
bell the Cotton.

if it isn’t in the title now, I couldn’t tell you who sponsors what bowl today.
The introduction of “The (random sponsor) Bowl” has done some work to make them feel smaller. Bowl games are supposed to be named after some random object of regional importance. None of these title deals can be worth very much in terms of actual brand awareness.
 

Thrawn II

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2025
Messages
2,576
Reaction score
6,630
The introduction of “The (random sponsor) Bowl” has done some work to make them feel smaller. Bowl games are supposed to be named after some random object of regional importance. None of these title deals can be worth very much in terms of actual brand awareness.
No doubt. The region-specific name, or at least keeping a permanent name like the Holiday Bowl, gives them a better history and sense of place. The sponsor-only ones all run together, especially if sponsors hop cities. the Pop-Tarts Bowl apparently used to be the Cheez-It Bowl, not to be confused with the Cheez-It Citrus Bowl or the Cheez-It Bowl that is currently the Rate Bowl and was formerly a bunch of other names out in Arizona.
 

Saul Berkley

Might Need to GFH
Joined
Nov 20, 2017
Messages
1,458
Reaction score
1,880
In the early 2000s, there were only like 25 total bowl games. 6-6 didn't guarantee you anything (e.g., 2007 Iowa Hawkeyes). They were all must-see tv, and in many ways, they were more fun than the system we have now.
Yea, there are more bowls but I don't think the Alamo or Sun Bowl or other mid tier bowls are any different now in the new setup than they were. I'm old enough to recall the 90s bowls setup and I agree they "felt" bigger but the teams had mediocre records than too. The Rose Bowl obviously has a completely different feel to how it was.

Anyway, I think it still means something to go to an Outback/Reliaquest level bowl and the team should almost always accept a bid. Especially at Iowa.
 
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
573
Reaction score
-865
If there were no more bowl games, I would probably be able to retire earlier. I don't care, I love going to Iowa bowl games.

I wonder if eventually we will see a second tournament. Sort of like an NIT for college football, with the higher seeded teams hosting and then the championship in a warm weather bowl destination.
 

CamelTones

Has Shoved A Live Shrimp Up His Ass
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
27,985
Reaction score
10,662
Did the Alamo Bowl ever really mean anything? I don't get this whole "the bowls used to mean something" The Alamo Bowl has always been a bunch of 7 or 8 win teams. Nothing has changed in that regard.
The 1996 Citrus Bowl featured 11-1 Ohio State against 10-1 Tennessee. But that was to my point earlier, there was a clear pecking order in the conference bowl selection. Now you’re sending your 5th or 6th best teams to that game. I remember when Iowa got the invite to Orlando after the 2004 season and what that symbolized back then.

Like someone posted, the lead up to the Tuesday night Alamo Bowl always felt awesome. Everyone was probably dumb for thinking there was any value in it, but in an effort to try and make the playoff fair, they’ve rendered the rest of the college football post season useless to the individuals participating in it.
 

HiawathaHawk

Might Need to GFH
Joined
Sep 21, 2010
Messages
14,595
Reaction score
1,858
Like someone posted, the lead up to the Tuesday night Alamo Bowl always felt awesome. Everyone was probably dumb for thinking there was any value in it, but in an effort to try and make the playoff fair, they’ve rendered the rest of the college football post season useless to the individuals participating in it.
Remember the half hour previews for each bowl that ESPN used to run during the day when you’d be home on Christmas break? It would be a host, some analyst and then the corporate suits. They’d give some highlights and a preview while mixing in full segments of all the wonderful things to do in San Antonio and how wonderful the sponsor was.

They were useless but to the earlier point, you got to see Sedrick Shaw highlights on ESPN and it was great. All of us that were around were on cloud nine after that Washington Sun Bowl.
 

The Dad

Legitimately bald forever and stupid looking
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
45,894
Reaction score
62,550
Remember the half hour previews for each bowl that ESPN used to run during the day when you’d be home on Christmas break? It would be a host, some analyst and then the corporate suits. They’d give some highlights and a preview while mixing in full segments of all the wonderful things to do in San Antonio and how wonderful the sponsor was.

They were useless but to the earlier point, you got to see Sedrick Shaw highlights on ESPN and it was great. All of us that were around were on cloud nine after that Washington Sun Bowl.
The spin moves Sedrick was administering that day deserved a 30-minute highlight show of their own.
 

neshawk

Might Need to GFH
Joined
Jul 25, 2020
Messages
1,579
Reaction score
2,984
I miss the old days when the Astro Bluebonnet Bowl was the only funny sounding bowl game.
 

Thrawn II

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2025
Messages
2,576
Reaction score
6,630
Like someone posted, the lead up to the Tuesday night Alamo Bowl always felt awesome. Everyone was probably dumb for thinking there was any value in it, but in an effort to try and make the playoff fair, they’ve rendered the rest of the college football post season useless to the individuals participating in it.
Remember the half hour previews for each bowl that ESPN used to run during the day when you’d be home on Christmas break? It would be a host, some analyst and then the corporate suits. They’d give some highlights and a preview while mixing in full segments of all the wonderful things to do in San Antonio and how wonderful the sponsor was.

They were useless but to the earlier point, you got to see Sedrick Shaw highlights on ESPN and it was great. All of us that were around were on cloud nine after that Washington Sun Bowl.
I think at some point ESPN sort of quit trying with storytelling for most of these games. Look at some older broadcasts. They introduce the game. They talk about storylines. They show all the starters. They seem interested in what is in front of them.



A more recent full Alamo Bowl. (May not be full broadcast intro but seems to be?) They jump straight into the game. They don’t show lineups. There are ads for other games on screen the entire time. It does not come across like a something that is worth your time.

 
Last edited:

cloudhawk

Special
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
100,019,032
Reaction score
13,450
They need some Brad Quast/ Vernon Rollins type LB's again
 

The Dad

Legitimately bald forever and stupid looking
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
45,894
Reaction score
62,550

Gushawk

Likely a Russian Bot Account
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
97,926
Reaction score
37,205
I love how Tommy built up to it.
 
Top