You really don't need to pick a side in a debate with doug because he argues both sides generally.Ironically, I didn't pick a side in the debate. He has a hard-on for me for some reason. Wait, that didn't come out right...Ahh....sounds right.
Incorrect.I made light of his coaching evaluation skills. I know, pretty serious stuff. Anyway, Doug pulled up a thread where I told a story from Thailand. He has determined that I switched the details around. Just another day on HALO...What did pierce do to flip Doug's hair trigger psycho switch here?
Only in Shawneeland is picking a loss and a loss arguing both sides of the debate. That is truly maddening when you think about how he came to that conclusion.You really don't need to pick a side in a debate with doug because he argues both sides generally.Ironically, I didn't pick a side in the debate. He has a hard-on for me for some reason. Wait, that didn't come out right...Ahh....sounds right.
Only in dougieland is picking a close, one possession game, and a "mud stomping" the same thing.Only in Shawneeland is picking a loss and a loss arguing both sides of the debate. That is truly maddening when you think about how he came to that conclusion.You really don't need to pick a side in a debate with doug because he argues both sides generally.Ironically, I didn't pick a side in the debate. He has a hard-on for me for some reason. Wait, that didn't come out right...
So that is a loss and a loss. Totally both sides of the fence.Only in dougieland is picking a close, one possession game, and a "mud stomping" the same thing.Only in Shawneeland is picking a loss and a loss arguing both sides of the debate. That is truly maddening when you think about how he came to that conclusion.You really don't need to pick a side in a debate with doug because he argues both sides generally.
No shit, and they are all boooorrriinnnng......Lots of e-boners for Ol' Douglas.
Correct, but I wanted to keep true to the Princess Bride quote.phrase.
No aggression at all, just saying he made love to a man.This aggression against Pierce will not stand, douglas. He's good people.
You remind me of a child that is constantly saying what they think the score will be and every five minutes they change it. So while, on this particular topic, you are on only one side of the fence(so far), you have managed to claim either by prediction or by "feeling" nearly every possible outcome scenario in an Iowa loss. A close loss and a mud stomping. But, again, I understand why you do this so often.So that is a loss and a loss. Totally both sides of the fence.Only in dougieland is picking a close, one possession game, and a "mud stomping" the same thing.Only in Shawneeland is picking a loss and a loss arguing both sides of the debate. That is truly maddening when you think about how he came to that conclusion.
I don't think that word means what you think it means lil' guy.
Agreed.Anyone willing to share that story with the board should never have it thrown in their face, dougie. It discourages other epic tales from being shared.
I liked that story better when the same thing happened in The Hangover II.Anyone willing to share that story with the board should never have it thrown in their face, dougie. It discourages other epic tales from being shared.
So I'm not actually on both sides of the fence or even close. Thanks for clearing that up, retard!You remind me of a child that is constantly saying what they think the score will be and every five minutes they change it. So while, on this particular topic, you are on only one side of the fence(so far), you have managed to claim either by prediction or by "feeling" nearly every possible outcome scenario in an Iowa loss. A close loss and a mud stomping. But, again, I understand why you do this so often.So that is a loss and a loss. Totally both sides of the fence.Only in dougieland is picking a close, one possession game, and a "mud stomping" the same thing.
I don't think that word means what you think it means lil' guy.
No, you just blanket things to cover as many of the possible outcomes as possible, just like on many other topics. Its funny as hell.So I'm not actually on both sides of the fence or even close. Thanks for clearing that up, retard!You remind me of a child that is constantly saying what they think the score will be and every five minutes they change it. So while, on this particular topic, you are on only one side of the fence(so far), you have managed to claim either by prediction or by "feeling" nearly every possible outcome scenario in an Iowa loss. A close loss and a mud stomping. But, again, I understand why you do this so often.So that is a loss and a loss. Totally both sides of the fence.
I don't think that word means what you think it means lil' guy.
The Princess Bride is a great flick, but Pierce prefers Tootsie.Correct, but I wanted to keep true to the Princess Bride quote.phrase.
No doug, no link.Link Shawnee?
Bump. JFC Doug. Take a walk. Rub one out. Get off the internet.Thread OVER!!!!!!!!!
What a fucking retard.Anyone who thinks that Brad Banks was a better QB than JVB needs to kill themselves immediately, or at least never post in the football forum again.
Jesus ChristWhat a fucking retard.Anyone who thinks that Brad Banks was a better QB than JVB needs to kill themselves immediately, or at least never post in the football forum again.
RATTLots of people here need to kill themselves.
When the mighty Whamo is on your side, one is usually RATT.RATT
Is there a character limit for taglines?i always thought that the both sides of fence analogy meant that when i am golfing and have to piss, i whip it out near the boundary of course and some of my piss goes over the fence while some of it hits the fence and stays on my side, while some of it gets on my pants or trickles down my leg.
Anyone who thinks that Brad Banks was a better QB than JVB needs to kill themselves immediately, or at least never post in the football forum again.
Twelve years later and I’m still not sure.Can we include basketball?
Here are some truths related to Iowa QBs.
1. Those who say that JVB is Christensen level bad are showing how little that they know about QB play. JC has his own place in the Iowa QB circles of hell. He was the worst QB to play meaningful minutes at Iowa post-1980, with the possible exception of anyone from 1995 - 2000 as my ability to watch games in those years was limited.
2. Anyone who ever saw JC play at Iowa and subsequently said that he could be an all Big 10 QB is a horrible judge of talent.
3. Brad Banks did his job well, but is overrated as a QB. Ask yourselves this question - why is it that he didn't get a shot in the NFL? Before you say that size is the issue, ask yourself why he didn't get a shot but Russell Wilson is getting a shot.
4. Drew Tate is underrated by most Iowa fans. That he accomplished what he did in 2004 with no running game is amazing.
the contrast with Kyle McCann certainly was more than a young and intemperate Gustang could abide at times.Saying Brad Banks wasn't that great or was overrated deceives my eyes and is one of the weirdest takes in the history of mankind
If Kirk wouldn't have let Beathard destroy himself in the bowl game against Florida he might've beenIowa hasnt had a legitimate NFL QB in my lifetime. Holding that against Banks seems harsh. Banks was small and somewhat inaccurate, but he added a playmaking element that had Iowa’s offense humming in a way that it hasn’t since under KF. If that team had a defense similar to those we’ve seen of late, holy fucking shit would have it been glorious.