The Big Ten went to 20 games this year. They were at 18 last year. The only reason there were games in December last year is because the schedule was moved up due to the BTT at MSG and the season ending a week early.
It isn't irrelevant. Iowa instead of playing Wisconsin and Michigan State would have played a couple of cupcake teams at home and won.
That is why I am pointing out that 19-5 this year means 21-3 with the previous schedules. Playing 2 more conference games led to games against Top 10 teams instead of Top 300 teams.
Hope this helps.
You keep saying this, but why are you assuming that the two “extra” league games that were added were the two difficult ones against MSU and Wisconsin that Iowa lost?
Was the 2019-20 schedule of conference teams known before the 2 additional were added?
Or could it have just as easily been games versus teams like Rutgers and Illinois that Iowa won anyway. So they actually benefited by playing 2 more conference cupcakes instead of non-con cupcakes.
Somewhat correct, but you can realistically only take away 2 games total from the teams they play twice.
That leaves Michigan State, Wisconsin, Ohio State, Indiana, Nebrantska, Northwestern and Rutgers.
The conference games would have never happened in December. Given the schedule to this point, they have only played Michigan State and Northwestern twice, so in your scenario remove those two games and add in 2 non-conference cupcakes.
I am simply saying that on February 11th as it stands Iowa would have 2 more wins and 2 less losses.