Debit One
Chad
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2007
- Messages
- 33,499
- Reaction score
- 23,419
Other than Stirtz, Combs, and Coleman, PGs are unwilling to come to Iowa because of it.Oh and it’s already affecting our recruiting at the PG position.
Other than Stirtz, Combs, and Coleman, PGs are unwilling to come to Iowa because of it.Oh and it’s already affecting our recruiting at the PG position.
You wouldn't know her, she goes to a different schoolboth sites are subscription only
No, they haven't. You're making it up.Both Kakert and Hawk Central- the people paid to cover the beat- have reported this. Seems like an odd thing to make up when it’s easy for anyone to verify it.
But you may have heard of her...Fawn Liebowitz?You wouldn't know her, she goes to a different school
This is starting to sound like the modern way of attaining information. Someone told you something that they saw somewhere and now it's fact because it agrees with your preconceived idea about the situation. No verification needed.Tremendous dumbfuck Tom Kakert posted it on his subscription site, that other folks have access to, but nobody else has also read it and started talking about it? Got it.
Did you literally see it? Sounds like you didn't since it's sub only.I mean he literally reported “a solid player who will see some minutes this year” but it’s just easier to call everyone else stupid.
We’re calling you stupid. Don’t bring everyone else into this.I mean he literally reported “a solid player who will see some minutes this year” but it’s just easier to call everyone else stupid.
Maybe Wade suffers from Multiple Personality Disorder, but in a cruel twist of fate all the personalities are retarded.We’re calling you stupid. Don’t bring everyone else into this.
yes, I have a subscription. To both sites. Hence how I was able to read the content. Science is fucking amazing.Did you literally see it? Sounds like you didn't since it's sub only.
Is it possible they're talking about Joey Matteoni or whatever?
Hmmm. Let me see.....where did I get the idea that you DIDN'T have a subscription? Oh yeah:yes, I have a subscription. To both sites. Hence how I was able to read the content. Science is fucking amazing.
Because SCIENCE would demonstrate that someone with subscription could screenshot it and post it, but you indicated you couldn't post it. That's strange.both sites are subscription only
lol holy shitHmmm. Let me see.....where did I get the idea that you DIDN'T have a subscription? Oh yeah:
Because SCIENCE would demonstrate that someone with subscription could screenshot it and post it, but you indicated you couldn't post it. That's strange.
If that’s specifically what was said, it very well could be true. “Solid player” could be said about a lot of guys, and “will see some minutes” is much more likely meaning in blowout situations vs Slippery Rock than a rotation player getting any meaningful minutes.I mean he literally reported “a solid player who will see some minutes this year” but it’s just easier to call everyone else stupid.
I think our boy Wade is adhering to the internet code of ethics for not sharing paid content on an unpaid site.Hmmm. Let me see.....where did I get the idea that you DIDN'T have a subscription? Oh yeah:
Because SCIENCE would demonstrate that someone with subscription could screenshot it and post it, but you indicated you couldn't post it. That's strange.
So let me get this straight. There's a piece of Juicy information that he read on a subscription site and couldn't wait to run over here to share with everyone, even though it's supposed to be information for subscribers only. But he's too ethical to screenshot it?I think our boy Wade is adhering to the internet code of ethics for not sharing paid content on an unpaid site.
I think.
Lets see how it plays out.So let me get this straight. There's a piece of Juicy information that he read on a subscription site and couldn't wait to run over here to share with everyone, even though it's supposed to be information for subscribers only. But he's too ethical to screenshot it?
















I pay for the subscriptions because I like to read about the hawks. So, no, and I am not going to blatantly break the rules and lose access to a service that I have already paid for.So let me get this straight. There's a piece of Juicy information that he read on a subscription site and couldn't wait to run over here to share with everyone, even though it's supposed to be information for subscribers only. But he's too ethical to screenshot it?
Again, not everyone. You.I pay for the subscriptions because I like to read about the hawks. So, no, and I am not going to blatantly break the rules and lose access to a service that I have already paid for.
if your argument is “LINK OR IT DIDNT HAPPEN”, then it’s probably pretty weak. But again, everyone else is stupid, right??
Just you, man. Just you.I pay for the subscriptions because I like to read about the hawks. So, no, and I am not going to blatantly break the rules and lose access to a service that I have already paid for.
if your argument is “LINK OR IT DIDNT HAPPEN”, then it’s probably pretty weak. But again, everyone else is stupid, right??
Here is what Gemini says about him:I haven't read the past few pages, and won't, but are we flipping out over Peyton McCollum here?
I’m guessing he would say you are a faggot. Or that he appreciates the site traffic as people search for the article. One of those two.Just you, man. Just you.
How do you think Tom would respond if he knew you were telling people about this exclusive information?
I don’t get this last part.I'm just skimming this thread, but Kakert seems to think McCollum will get some minutes. That doesn't really justify Wade's refusal to ever shut up about it.
"Peyton McCollum... very solid player who will see some minutes this year."
I wish he was at Drake or wherever, but I'm not going to spend a lot of time preemptively complaining.
I guess I’m just retarded
there have been roughly 1000x times as many posts where people are complaining about my opinion as posts where I have actually brought this up.I'm just skimming this thread, but Kakert seems to think McCollum will get some minutes. That doesn't really justify Wade's refusal to ever shut up about it.
"Peyton McCollum... very solid player who will see some minutes this year."
I wish he was at Drake or wherever, but I'm not going to spend a lot of time preemptively complaining.
Tom wouldn't say I'm a faggot. He likes me. He would say you're retarded, because he has.I’m guessing he would say you are a faggot. Or that he appreciates the site traffic as people search for the article. One of those two.
just my guess though.
This is dumb though. You’re implying that McCollum could possibly be too blind to see if he’s not good enough.there have been roughly 1000x times as many posts where people are complaining about my opinion as posts where I have actually brought this up.
your complaints should instead be directed towards content such as “Peyton mccollum sets the tone defensively” or “Peyton can fill the ballhandling role left by Stirtz” or “pg will be handled by a combination of combs, Coleman, and McCollum”.
again, I hope he’s improved a bunch because they clearly plan to play him.
I suppose it’s possible that we hired the only coach in the world with the ability to treat their kid objectively.This is dumb though. You’re implying that McCollum could possibly be too blind to see if he’s not good enough.
Have you heard of Fred Hoiberg?I suppose it’s possible that we hired the only coach in the world with the ability to treat their kid objectively.
But, after quietly giving a kid with only D3 opportunities a big ten scholarship, I have my reservations.
He's the coach at Nebrantska, right?Have you heard of Fred Hoiberg?
Correct. He has a midget son who walked on, later got a scholarship. Fans were critical at first but the kid became a very solid player that other teams hated.He's the coach at Nebrantska, right?
Good looking guy who struggles counting to five?Have you heard of Fred Hoiberg?
You’re approaching NLP territory on this.I suppose it’s possible that we hired the only coach in the world with the ability to treat their kid objectively.
But, after quietly giving a kid with only D3 opportunities a big ten scholarship, I have my reservations.
Lol. So you are reading the preseason coverage of iowa Basketball and your conclusion is that McCollum is not going to be in the rotation?You’re approaching NLP territory on this.
Point where on the doll your HS coach hurt you.
I’ve read damn near everything there is to read on preseason hoops coverage and concluding that McCollum and Matteoni will get to play in the noncon games when there is minimal legit pressure on them. I’d set their over/under for conference play minutes around 2 and take the under (though they may sneak in enough late good/bad games to hit the over).Lol. So you are reading the preseason coverage of iowa Basketball and your conclusion is that McCollum is not going to be in the rotation?