$866 per student if there are 30,000 students. Slightly more than a rounding error in college costs. and even doing half that would barely be noticeable and make it easier to cover elsewhere. I'm sure would be met with outrage by some, but wouldn't take long to die away and just be another fee.
While I HOPE they don't actually do that, because I don't like the idea of it. I probably would find the alternative worse. And it makes more sense to put the cost on students that more benefit from the athletics than on state taxpayers.
If you're an in state student, that would be about a 5% hike in tuition, that would basically be going straight into the pockets of Iowa State athletes. Not into general funds, building maintenance, or anything like that - to *fund the personal incomes of Cyclone players in only the sports covered by House.*
Good luck selling that to ISU's historical feeder population, much less to a BoR that's been obsessed with cost control for decades.
If the choice is really "keep FBS status" vs. "balance the athletics budget" I'd be very nervous as a Cyclone fan right now, because unless Pollard wins Powerball tonight FBS status will require fully one-quarter of ISU's athletics budget to be subsidized, starting next year and continuing into perpetuity. And there was substantial complaining from the Regents *this year* about ISU and UI having 6% institutional budget increases.
Y'all enjoy yourselves in the MVC.