2017 Recruiting Thread

Geese

LOVES Chris Williams
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
22,354
Reaction score
-43,070
In case you guys haven't seen a scouting report on Garza - he's tall! Taller than most HS players!!

Thanks King James!
 

douglasbader

Thinks Trump is smart.
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
96,116
Reaction score
-55,702
I'm sure that Garza never played hundreds of AAU games against players his size and talent level. He totally has played only high school ball against 6'5'' centers and coaches offered him because he was a head taller. Schools like Indiana, Louisville, Notre Dame and Georgetown offered him because they were tricked by him playing against smaller competition.
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
15,906
Reaction score
-13,715
This is why programs should start hiring recruiting coordinators for basketball as well.

"Coach, settle down now, you have to remember he's taller than his opponents."
 

6deuce

6douche
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
9,773
Reaction score
-10,186
I think @The Dad is still reeling from realizing he (the Dad not Garza) is a gigantic faggot.
 

Revolver

Will Ruin Your Thread and Crush Your Dreams
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
26,286
Reaction score
-29,934
"Does he play below the rim?"

Well, he's not one of the Monstars, so.....
 

The Dad

Legitimately Bald Forever and Stupid Looking
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
20,878
Reaction score
-20,182
Those guys all get/got fucked more than valpo.
 

Bob

Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
6,031
Reaction score
-5,715
It turns out being tall is really fucking useful in basketball, who knew?
 

Berzerkenpas

Desperately Wants a Mod-Edited Tag Line
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,551
Reaction score
-1,203
footwork is sound, soft hands, can shoot it with a quick release, runs the floor. long arms, pro frame. garza is going to be fucking good.
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2011
Messages
546
Reaction score
-934
footwork is sound, soft hands, can shoot it with a quick release, runs the floor. long arms, pro frame. garza is going to be fucking good.
Also he plays with an attitude. He will be a great addition to this team, toughness inside was just lacking this year obviously.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Messages
1,206
Reaction score
-1,175
I will enjoy watching Bohannon, Weiskamp, Baer, Nunge, and Garza space the floor in a couple years.
 

Geese

LOVES Chris Williams
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
22,354
Reaction score
-43,070
I'd rather have Spud Webb than Garza. Dude played above the rim.
 

mac50702

SuperUrkel
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Messages
6,086
Reaction score
-6,742
Has the drafted against his will joke been made yet? If not, this is one
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2010
Messages
11,189
Reaction score
-6,291
Kriener showed enough this year that I don't want to write him off but if Garza delivers like he could, I don't see a fit for him with Cook, Pemsl, Nunge, Baer, Wagner and Garza here. He'll have a year in the system on him but Garza looks like a bigger, better version.
 

Bob

Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
6,031
Reaction score
-5,715
Baer already almost exclusively plays on the wing in lineups that have two other bigs, and yeah I think they view Nunge as a Uthoff type
 
Last edited:

CurdMan

TurdMan
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
2,861
Reaction score
-2,851
I thunk nunge and bear will play SF
Wagner may end up there a bit too when Garza or RK are in the game. I'm still holding out a bit of hope for a Nunge redshirt, just because even if he is really good he still isn't going to get many minutes. Putting him in Weiskamp's class seems ideal
 

CurdMan

TurdMan
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
2,861
Reaction score
-2,851
Wagner may end up there a bit
This would be awful
No shit. That was an awful claim @CurdMan
Offense isn't going to be the issue for this team. Defensively, I would expect Fran to continue playing a lot of zone and Wagner is a capable defender. I don't think it's completely ridiculous to think Fran will run a lineup out there that includes Garza, Cook or Pemsl, and Wagner. Garza's ability to step out and shoot it will help with spacing. It isn't ideal to run Wagner at the 3, but when Baer needs a break, it's going to get iffy. Iowa just isn't going to have enough depth to run 3 guards out there at once and not be a major liability on defense. Among the 3s and 4s on the roster, Wagner is the most capable of keeping up with other teams' guards.

Unless Iowa lands a difference maker at SG or SF, one of the forwards other than Baer is going to get minutes at the 3.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
7,855
Reaction score
-5,473
This would be awful
No shit. That was an awful claim @CurdMan
Offense isn't going to be the issue for this team. Defensively, I would expect Fran to continue playing a lot of zone and Wagner is a capable defender. I don't think it's completely ridiculous to think Fran will run a lineup out there that includes Garza, Cook or Pemsl, and Wagner. Garza's ability to step out and shoot it will help with spacing. It isn't ideal to run Wagner at the 3, but when Baer needs a break, it's going to get iffy. Iowa just isn't going to have enough depth to run 3 guards out there at once and not be a major liability on defense. Among the 3s and 4s on the roster, Wagner is the most capable of keeping up with other teams' guards.

Unless Iowa lands a difference maker at SG or SF, one of the forwards other than Baer is going to get minutes at the 3.
Nunge is a 3 and he will be playing serious minutes next year.
 

Brownzy

Important Backpack Wearer
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
1,146
Reaction score
-1,683
No shit. That was an awful claim @CurdMan
Offense isn't going to be the issue for this team. Defensively, I would expect Fran to continue playing a lot of zone and Wagner is a capable defender. I don't think it's completely ridiculous to think Fran will run a lineup out there that includes Garza, Cook or Pemsl, and Wagner. Garza's ability to step out and shoot it will help with spacing. It isn't ideal to run Wagner at the 3, but when Baer needs a break, it's going to get iffy. Iowa just isn't going to have enough depth to run 3 guards out there at once and not be a major liability on defense. Among the 3s and 4s on the roster, Wagner is the most capable of keeping up with other teams' guards.

Unless Iowa lands a difference maker at SG or SF, one of the forwards other than Baer is going to get minutes at the 3.
Nunge is a 3 and he will be playing serious minutes next year.
So....this lineup could be fun?

Garza - 6-11
Cook - 6-8
Nunge 6-10?
Moss
Bohannon
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
13,070
Reaction score
-8,953
Provided Dom Uhl and Ahmed Wagner still haven't learned how to play basketball by fall then maybe
 

Revolver

Will Ruin Your Thread and Crush Your Dreams
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
26,286
Reaction score
-29,934
Provided Dom Uhl and Ahmed Wagner still haven't learned how to play basketball by fall then maybe
Ahmad Wagner was fine towards the end of the year when he embraced his role and didn't try to do too much. He's not a skilled basketball player, but he plays damn hard and has some athletic ability. Putting him in that category with Dom Uhl is unfair.
 

Berzerkenpas

Desperately Wants a Mod-Edited Tag Line
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,551
Reaction score
-1,203
Uhl and Wagner will come off the bench next year -- in limited minutes. Unless they make huge jumps, we're probably looking at:

1: Bohannon/McCaffery/Dailey
2: Moss(?)/Ellingson/Williams(?)
3: Baer/Nunge
4: Cook/Pemsl/Wagner
5: Garza/Kreiner

Wagner could the nod over Pemsl, but it's far more likely that Pemsl wins the minutes battle there. Uhl doesn't seem to fit anywhere, unless he starts at the 3, plays 5 minutes, then sits the rest of the night.
 

L. Wade Childress

Is Texting Right Now
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
55,495
Reaction score
-17,092
I agree that baer will play most of the minutes at small forward but after watching him play I am totally on board with the idea of nunge playing major minutes there as well. Then you basically have cook/Pemsl/garza/Kriener splitting time at the 4/5.

I know he is a highly regarded recruit but it would not surprise me if Garza comes in and is a little behind everyone at practice and they consider redshirting him. Mainly because Kriener and uhl will be decent on defense.

Hopefully he plays to his ranking and is an immediate contributor though. Especially because that means that Dom is not getting many minutes.
 

L. Wade Childress

Is Texting Right Now
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
55,495
Reaction score
-17,092
Also it sounds like crazy Roy thinks that Mark Smith will not decide until April so it would be awesome if we could somehow get into that mix after the transfers are announced.
 

mac50702

SuperUrkel
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Messages
6,086
Reaction score
-6,742
I wasn't really impressed with kriener, I Don't get what all the excitement is for him.
 

AZmess

Loved and Defended The Criminal Until the Bitter End
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Messages
33,604
Reaction score
-18,081
I wasn't really impressed with kriener, I Don't get what all the excitement is for him.
Impressed is probably too strong. But he showed that the ability is there.

He can score in the post, hit a jumper, can defend and rebound. The tools are there. He just needs experience/minutes.
 

MikeyJoe

Has a Big Head
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
61,560
Reaction score
-49,109
Kriener is fine. Shot okay, decent rebounder. Nothing that's going to crowd out a more talented underclassman.
 

Brownzy

Important Backpack Wearer
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
1,146
Reaction score
-1,683
Kriener is fine. Shot okay, decent rebounder. Nothing that's going to crowd out a more talented underclassman.
I don't see how people really see him as a center. With another big or two in the lineup it helps, but put him beside Garza and I think his role can expand.

(I really hope Garza is a stud btw)
 

Bob

Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
6,031
Reaction score
-5,715
It's a tiny sample so you can't extrapolate too much but Kriener was productive when he got minutes. His per 40 rebounding numbers were good and he flashed a pretty polished all around offensive game. I won't be heartbroken if he gets passed by the new guys and lost in the shuffle but I think he's fairly promising
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Messages
1,206
Reaction score
-1,175
I wasn't really impressed with kriener, I Don't get what all the excitement is for him.
Impressed is probably too strong. But he showed that the ability is there.

He can score in the post, hit a jumper, can defend and rebound. The tools are there. He just needs experience/minutes.
I think it was a combination of things but the skill is definitely there. He has great touch and isn't a black hole like Cook in the post. The other intriguing part is that of all the freshman he could benefit most from an offseason and little more strength. Also, he actually tries on defense but his aggressiveness made him loom like a tard from time to time.
 

AZmess

Loved and Defended The Criminal Until the Bitter End
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Messages
33,604
Reaction score
-18,081
Loom. Tard. Ironic.
 

Talkin' Goat

Lothario
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
9,176
Reaction score
-17,330
Also it sounds like crazy Roy thinks that Mark Smith will not decide until April so it would be awesome if we could somehow get into that mix after the transfers are announced.
From crazy Roy:
OK--now Mark Smith's recruitment has gotten certifiably crazy. Kentucky supposedky reached out today per sources.
 

Slidewilly

Independent centrist moderate
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
8,132
Reaction score
-2,196
It's a tiny sample so you can't extrapolate too much but Kriener was productive when he got minutes. His per 40 rebounding numbers were good and he flashed a pretty polished all around offensive game. I won't be heartbroken if he gets passed by the new guys and lost in the shuffle but I think he's fairly promising
He had some good games, particularly in the win over Purdue--but not enough minutes to draw any firm conclusions. He could end up anywhere from a solid starter to a deep sub. Hope to see significant improvement from him as a sophomore, but without at least one redshirt among the bigs, minutes will be tight.
 
Top