2017 Recruiting Thread

Geese

LOVES Chris Williams
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
22,372
Reaction score
-43,011
In case you guys haven't seen a scouting report on Garza - he's tall! Taller than most HS players!!

Thanks King James!
 

douglasbader

Thought Tom Brady's Career Was Over in 2008
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
99,340
Reaction score
-49,021
I'm sure that Garza never played hundreds of AAU games against players his size and talent level. He totally has played only high school ball against 6'5'' centers and coaches offered him because he was a head taller. Schools like Indiana, Louisville, Notre Dame and Georgetown offered him because they were tricked by him playing against smaller competition.
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
16,217
Reaction score
-12,860
This is why programs should start hiring recruiting coordinators for basketball as well.

"Coach, settle down now, you have to remember he's taller than his opponents."
 

6deuce

6douche
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
10,092
Reaction score
-9,611
I think @The Dad is still reeling from realizing he (the Dad not Garza) is a gigantic faggot.
 

Revolver

Will Ruin Your Thread and Crush Your Dreams
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
26,785
Reaction score
-28,847
"Does he play below the rim?"

Well, he's not one of the Monstars, so.....
 

The Dad

Legitimately Bald Forever and Stupid Looking
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
22,431
Reaction score
-16,021
Those guys all get/got fucked more than valpo.
 

Bob

Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
6,031
Reaction score
-5,715
It turns out being tall is really fucking useful in basketball, who knew?
 

Berzerkenpas

Desperately Wants a Mod-Edited Tag Line
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,771
Reaction score
-852
footwork is sound, soft hands, can shoot it with a quick release, runs the floor. long arms, pro frame. garza is going to be fucking good.
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2011
Messages
584
Reaction score
-828
footwork is sound, soft hands, can shoot it with a quick release, runs the floor. long arms, pro frame. garza is going to be fucking good.
Also he plays with an attitude. He will be a great addition to this team, toughness inside was just lacking this year obviously.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Messages
1,244
Reaction score
-1,081
I will enjoy watching Bohannon, Weiskamp, Baer, Nunge, and Garza space the floor in a couple years.
 

Geese

LOVES Chris Williams
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
22,372
Reaction score
-43,011
I'd rather have Spud Webb than Garza. Dude played above the rim.
 

mac50702

SuperUrkel
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Messages
6,288
Reaction score
-6,388
Has the drafted against his will joke been made yet? If not, this is one
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2010
Messages
11,386
Reaction score
-5,848
Kriener showed enough this year that I don't want to write him off but if Garza delivers like he could, I don't see a fit for him with Cook, Pemsl, Nunge, Baer, Wagner and Garza here. He'll have a year in the system on him but Garza looks like a bigger, better version.
 

Bob

Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
6,031
Reaction score
-5,715
Baer already almost exclusively plays on the wing in lineups that have two other bigs, and yeah I think they view Nunge as a Uthoff type
 
Last edited:

CurdMan

TurdMan
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
2,905
Reaction score
-2,795
I thunk nunge and bear will play SF
Wagner may end up there a bit too when Garza or RK are in the game. I'm still holding out a bit of hope for a Nunge redshirt, just because even if he is really good he still isn't going to get many minutes. Putting him in Weiskamp's class seems ideal
 

CurdMan

TurdMan
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
2,905
Reaction score
-2,795
Wagner may end up there a bit
This would be awful
No shit. That was an awful claim @CurdMan
Offense isn't going to be the issue for this team. Defensively, I would expect Fran to continue playing a lot of zone and Wagner is a capable defender. I don't think it's completely ridiculous to think Fran will run a lineup out there that includes Garza, Cook or Pemsl, and Wagner. Garza's ability to step out and shoot it will help with spacing. It isn't ideal to run Wagner at the 3, but when Baer needs a break, it's going to get iffy. Iowa just isn't going to have enough depth to run 3 guards out there at once and not be a major liability on defense. Among the 3s and 4s on the roster, Wagner is the most capable of keeping up with other teams' guards.

Unless Iowa lands a difference maker at SG or SF, one of the forwards other than Baer is going to get minutes at the 3.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
8,165
Reaction score
-4,991
This would be awful
No shit. That was an awful claim @CurdMan
Offense isn't going to be the issue for this team. Defensively, I would expect Fran to continue playing a lot of zone and Wagner is a capable defender. I don't think it's completely ridiculous to think Fran will run a lineup out there that includes Garza, Cook or Pemsl, and Wagner. Garza's ability to step out and shoot it will help with spacing. It isn't ideal to run Wagner at the 3, but when Baer needs a break, it's going to get iffy. Iowa just isn't going to have enough depth to run 3 guards out there at once and not be a major liability on defense. Among the 3s and 4s on the roster, Wagner is the most capable of keeping up with other teams' guards.

Unless Iowa lands a difference maker at SG or SF, one of the forwards other than Baer is going to get minutes at the 3.
Nunge is a 3 and he will be playing serious minutes next year.
 

Brownzy

Important Backpack Wearer
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
1,158
Reaction score
-1,673
No shit. That was an awful claim @CurdMan
Offense isn't going to be the issue for this team. Defensively, I would expect Fran to continue playing a lot of zone and Wagner is a capable defender. I don't think it's completely ridiculous to think Fran will run a lineup out there that includes Garza, Cook or Pemsl, and Wagner. Garza's ability to step out and shoot it will help with spacing. It isn't ideal to run Wagner at the 3, but when Baer needs a break, it's going to get iffy. Iowa just isn't going to have enough depth to run 3 guards out there at once and not be a major liability on defense. Among the 3s and 4s on the roster, Wagner is the most capable of keeping up with other teams' guards.

Unless Iowa lands a difference maker at SG or SF, one of the forwards other than Baer is going to get minutes at the 3.
Nunge is a 3 and he will be playing serious minutes next year.
So....this lineup could be fun?

Garza - 6-11
Cook - 6-8
Nunge 6-10?
Moss
Bohannon
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
13,833
Reaction score
-7,799
Provided Dom Uhl and Ahmed Wagner still haven't learned how to play basketball by fall then maybe
 

Revolver

Will Ruin Your Thread and Crush Your Dreams
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
26,785
Reaction score
-28,847
Provided Dom Uhl and Ahmed Wagner still haven't learned how to play basketball by fall then maybe
Ahmad Wagner was fine towards the end of the year when he embraced his role and didn't try to do too much. He's not a skilled basketball player, but he plays damn hard and has some athletic ability. Putting him in that category with Dom Uhl is unfair.
 

Berzerkenpas

Desperately Wants a Mod-Edited Tag Line
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,771
Reaction score
-852
Uhl and Wagner will come off the bench next year -- in limited minutes. Unless they make huge jumps, we're probably looking at:

1: Bohannon/McCaffery/Dailey
2: Moss(?)/Ellingson/Williams(?)
3: Baer/Nunge
4: Cook/Pemsl/Wagner
5: Garza/Kreiner

Wagner could the nod over Pemsl, but it's far more likely that Pemsl wins the minutes battle there. Uhl doesn't seem to fit anywhere, unless he starts at the 3, plays 5 minutes, then sits the rest of the night.
 

L. Wade Childress

Is Texting Right Now
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
57,522
Reaction score
-16,141
I agree that baer will play most of the minutes at small forward but after watching him play I am totally on board with the idea of nunge playing major minutes there as well. Then you basically have cook/Pemsl/garza/Kriener splitting time at the 4/5.

I know he is a highly regarded recruit but it would not surprise me if Garza comes in and is a little behind everyone at practice and they consider redshirting him. Mainly because Kriener and uhl will be decent on defense.

Hopefully he plays to his ranking and is an immediate contributor though. Especially because that means that Dom is not getting many minutes.
 

L. Wade Childress

Is Texting Right Now
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
57,522
Reaction score
-16,141
Also it sounds like crazy Roy thinks that Mark Smith will not decide until April so it would be awesome if we could somehow get into that mix after the transfers are announced.
 

mac50702

SuperUrkel
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Messages
6,288
Reaction score
-6,388
I wasn't really impressed with kriener, I Don't get what all the excitement is for him.
 

AZmess

Loved and Defended The Criminal Until the Bitter End
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Messages
34,126
Reaction score
-17,346
I wasn't really impressed with kriener, I Don't get what all the excitement is for him.
Impressed is probably too strong. But he showed that the ability is there.

He can score in the post, hit a jumper, can defend and rebound. The tools are there. He just needs experience/minutes.
 

MikeyJoe

Has a Big Head
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
62,943
Reaction score
-43,042
Kriener is fine. Shot okay, decent rebounder. Nothing that's going to crowd out a more talented underclassman.
 

Brownzy

Important Backpack Wearer
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
1,158
Reaction score
-1,673
Kriener is fine. Shot okay, decent rebounder. Nothing that's going to crowd out a more talented underclassman.
I don't see how people really see him as a center. With another big or two in the lineup it helps, but put him beside Garza and I think his role can expand.

(I really hope Garza is a stud btw)
 

Bob

Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
6,031
Reaction score
-5,715
It's a tiny sample so you can't extrapolate too much but Kriener was productive when he got minutes. His per 40 rebounding numbers were good and he flashed a pretty polished all around offensive game. I won't be heartbroken if he gets passed by the new guys and lost in the shuffle but I think he's fairly promising
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Messages
1,244
Reaction score
-1,081
I wasn't really impressed with kriener, I Don't get what all the excitement is for him.
Impressed is probably too strong. But he showed that the ability is there.

He can score in the post, hit a jumper, can defend and rebound. The tools are there. He just needs experience/minutes.
I think it was a combination of things but the skill is definitely there. He has great touch and isn't a black hole like Cook in the post. The other intriguing part is that of all the freshman he could benefit most from an offseason and little more strength. Also, he actually tries on defense but his aggressiveness made him loom like a tard from time to time.
 

AZmess

Loved and Defended The Criminal Until the Bitter End
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Messages
34,126
Reaction score
-17,346
Loom. Tard. Ironic.
 

Talkin' Goat

Lothario
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
9,501
Reaction score
-16,422
Also it sounds like crazy Roy thinks that Mark Smith will not decide until April so it would be awesome if we could somehow get into that mix after the transfers are announced.
From crazy Roy:
OK--now Mark Smith's recruitment has gotten certifiably crazy. Kentucky supposedky reached out today per sources.
 

Slidewilly

Independent centrist moderate
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
8,315
Reaction score
-1,998
It's a tiny sample so you can't extrapolate too much but Kriener was productive when he got minutes. His per 40 rebounding numbers were good and he flashed a pretty polished all around offensive game. I won't be heartbroken if he gets passed by the new guys and lost in the shuffle but I think he's fairly promising
He had some good games, particularly in the win over Purdue--but not enough minutes to draw any firm conclusions. He could end up anywhere from a solid starter to a deep sub. Hope to see significant improvement from him as a sophomore, but without at least one redshirt among the bigs, minutes will be tight.
 
Top