**Official 2022 Iowa Football Season Thread**

AZmessDAWG

Loved and Defended The Criminal Until the Bitter End
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Messages
46,306
Reaction score
3,676
It’s fashionable to say kids nowadays are soft.
 

MikeyJoe

has a big head
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
74,325
Reaction score
17,939
Sure, but I think you’re misrepresenting that by a bit. It’s called developmental, and it has the 5th most nfl guys or whatever because they average the lowest in recruiting among those top 5 teams. Iowa doesn’t and won’t recruit at the same level as the other teams that put guys in the nfl, yet there iowa is, near the top. That’s development, and iowa is excellent at it.
That’s a double edge sword because they also win nowhere near the level of those other 5 teams.

So they’re good at developing talent but not great at using it to win games. Which I suppose is fine if you’re primarily rooting for your team to put a lot of guys in the NFL.
 

Alan Lomax

has listened to a podcast about this thread.
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
18,542
Reaction score
18,888
It’s fashionable to say kids nowadays are soft.
I don’t know about high level athletes specifically, and I hope they’re more in control of their lives. But young people in general are softer and struggle with conflicting thoughts, to the point they kill themselves at higher rates than ever before.
 

CurdMan

TurdMan DDS
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
4,119
Reaction score
-822
I am conflicted on how I want the rest of the season to play out. I can’t imagine rooting against Iowa, but it seems like winning validates this shit. I have always loved Kirk but I think I am ready to see something different.
 

Alan Lomax

has listened to a podcast about this thread.
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
18,542
Reaction score
18,888
That’s a double edge sword because they also win nowhere near the level of those other 5 teams.

So they’re good at developing talent but not great at using it to win games. Which I suppose is fine if you’re primarily rooting for your team to put a lot of guys in the NFL.
Absolutely! And I think that’s the choice we’re making as iowa fans. Iowa won’t be a consistent national title contender, ever. The demographics are too stacked. Maybe someday one day, sure. So what IS success? As an Iowa fan I think nfl placement is a fantastic measure.
 

Pinehawk

Regina Douche
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Messages
22,043
Reaction score
8,446
Can’t believe they said Petras OR Padilla. They couldn’t even commit to giving Padilla a start after bringing him on last week.
Everyone knows something needs to change. But, it won’t.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
9,743
Reaction score
-2,531
Can’t believe they said Petras OR Padilla. They couldn’t even commit to giving Padilla a start after bringing him on last week.
Everyone knows something needs to change. But, it won’t.
They may still be retards and play Petras, but you're wasting your time looking at the depth chart. Depth charts reflect the last game, not the next game. For example, Nwankpa was running with the 2s in pregame at OSU and now he's in the depth chart.
 
  • GFY
Reactions: BBK

Hawkeye_Pierce

May Have Fondled a Tranny
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
12,341
Reaction score
1,202
Can’t believe they said Petras OR Padilla. They couldn’t even commit to giving Padilla a start after bringing him on last week.
Everyone knows something needs to change. But, it won’t.
Is that the official statement? If it is, that’s some serious pussy shit. Also suggests that they’re not turning over all of the first team reps to Padilla which seems insane.
 

Hawk&Balls

NOT a member
Joined
May 1, 2016
Messages
50,725
Reaction score
36,652
They may still be retards and play Petras, but you're wasting your time looking at the depth chart. Depth charts reflect the last game, not the next game. For example, Nwankpa was running with the 2s in pregame at OSU and now he's in the depth chart.
Eh, half true. A lot of time they'll reflect injuries.
 

Whatever

Loves Fayette
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
13,494
Reaction score
-2,118
That’s a double edge sword because they also win nowhere near the level of those other 5 teams.

So they’re good at developing talent but not great at using it to win games. Which I suppose is fine if you’re primarily rooting for your team to put a lot of guys in the NFL.
That’s not completely true. Iowa hasn’t won consistently at that level, but you wouldn’t expect that. They have had a few years like 2002, 2009 and 2015 where it paid off and they won above their level.
 

douglasbader

Said Tom Brady's Career Was Over in 2008
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
135,271
Reaction score
29,708
That’s a double edge sword because they also win nowhere near the level of those other 5 teams.

So they’re good at developing talent but not great at using it to win games. Which I suppose is fine if you’re primarily rooting for your team to put a lot of guys in the NFL.
Bullshit.. They were 15 seconds from glory and they win more games than almost everyone the last 7 years.
 

thrawn

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2019
Messages
26,005
Reaction score
58,760
Please Venmo me two minutes of my life back for that link
 

WCFHawkeye

actually likes the XFL
Joined
Jul 14, 2009
Messages
12,723
Reaction score
8,230
The shitty content isn't important. What is, is that Iowa is a national punching bag and laughingstock. Not good.
 

Gushawk

Likely a Russian Bot Account
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
98,429
Reaction score
38,523
Is that the official statement? If it is, that’s some serious pussy shit. Also suggests that they’re not turning over all of the first team reps to Padilla which seems insane.
very real

 

Kamala

Isn't Sure About Gasser
Joined
Feb 14, 2010
Messages
16,793
Reaction score
9,284
Absolutely! And I think that’s the choice we’re making as iowa fans. Iowa won’t be a consistent national title contender, ever. The demographics are too stacked. Maybe someday one day, sure. So what IS success? As an Iowa fan I think nfl placement is a fantastic measure.
I think NFL placement is a horrible measure. I do not care at all about how many players get drafted and it’s not relevant to watching an Iowa game on a college football Saturday. Never once have the Hawkeyes lost and I’ve consoled myself with the likelihood some of the players will he drafted. Also once former Hawkeyes get to the NFL, unless they play for the Raiders, they are dead to me.
If anything the amount of players drafted irritates me that we aren’t better.

If we go 6-6 but have 5 future NFL players in the team,we have succeeded at the level of a six win team. Future draft picks do not retroactively make the team more successful
 

Alan Lomax

has listened to a podcast about this thread.
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
18,542
Reaction score
18,888
I think NFL placement is a horrible measure. I do not care at all about how many players get drafted and it’s not relevant to watching an Iowa game on a college football Saturday. Never once have the Hawkeyes lost and I’ve consoled myself with the likelihood some of the players will he drafted. Also once former Hawkeyes get to the NFL, unless they play for the Raiders, they are dead to me.
If anything the amount of players drafted irritates me that we aren’t better.

If we go 6-6 but have 5 future NFL players in the team,we have succeeded at the level of a six win team. Future draft picks do not retroactively make the team more successful
Maybe for you. People choose all sorts of things for how they measure success. Some in national titles, some 9 wins or more, some division titles, some conference titles, some playoff appearances, some a combination of above with nfl placement. If you’re unable to understand that…I got nothing, it’s a pretty simple thing to understand.
 

The Full Monte

Does Weirdo Fat Guy Shit
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
20,408
Reaction score
10,374
That’s a double edge sword because they also win nowhere near the level of those other 5 teams.

So they’re good at developing talent but not great at using it to win games. Which I suppose is fine if you’re primarily rooting for your team to put a lot of guys in the NFL.
That’s the Wisconsin Paradox

Iowa has 1.5 times the number of guys in the NFL. They’ve also vastly outperformed us the last decade.
 

Gushawk

Likely a Russian Bot Account
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
98,429
Reaction score
38,523
That OL is just so bad. They can practice every minute of their lives together and they’ll never get to even decent.
I’ve given up on plumb, dejong, and pretty much colby, but still have some hope for Jones, elsbury, richman, stephens and that red head HaMo likes that for some reason is no longer on the depth chart
 

Kamala

Isn't Sure About Gasser
Joined
Feb 14, 2010
Messages
16,793
Reaction score
9,284
Maybe for you. People choose all sorts of things for how they measure success. Some in national titles, some 9 wins or more, some division titles, some conference titles, some playoff appearances, some a combination of above with nfl placement. If you’re unable to understand that…I got nothing, it’s a pretty simple thing to understand.
Right, for me. Obviously
 

The Full Monte

Does Weirdo Fat Guy Shit
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
20,408
Reaction score
10,374
I think NFL placement is a horrible measure. I do not care at all about how many players get drafted and it’s not relevant to watching an Iowa game on a college football Saturday. Never once have the Hawkeyes lost and I’ve consoled myself with the likelihood some of the players will he drafted. Also once former Hawkeyes get to the NFL, unless they play for the Raiders, they are dead to me.
If anything the amount of players drafted irritates me that we aren’t better.

If we go 6-6 but have 5 future NFL players in the team,we have succeeded at the level of a six win team. Future draft picks do not retroactively make the team more successful
Fucking THIS
 

Shawneemicks

Has said plenty of things dumber than this
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
18,105
Reaction score
12,847
I’ve given up on plumb, dejong, and pretty much colby, but still have some hope for Jones, elsbury, richman, stephens and that red head HaMo likes that for some reason is no longer on the depth chart
I think Richman & Stephens are really bad
 

Thomas Wolsey

Likes Your Post
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Messages
29,845
Reaction score
31,118
I’ve given up on plumb, dejong, and pretty much colby, but still have some hope for Jones, elsbury, richman, stephens and that red head HaMo likes that for some reason is no longer on the depth chart
Colby is a true sophomore. He might not be an RT but IF KP comes, you could see him moving inside next year and being effective. Pick up a transfer guard and have Jones figure out how to snap the ball and they could be pretty good.

QB and WR on the other hand, woof.
 

Gushawk

Likely a Russian Bot Account
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
98,429
Reaction score
38,523
Hopefully Padilla goes to practices and film sessions this week
hopefully the coaches finally realize that Spencer Petras is the least athletic and effective QB in college football even if he doesn’t
 

rodg12

Might not need to GFH
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
4,258
Reaction score
5,796
Colby is a true sophomore. He might not be an RT but IF KP comes, you could see him moving inside next year and being effective. Pick up a transfer guard and have Jones figure out how to snap the ball and they could be pretty good.

QB and WR on the other hand, woof.
This is one of those things where if it hasn't happened by now, not sure how it happens in the future. The snap issues are unconscionable.
 

Alan Lomax

has listened to a podcast about this thread.
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
18,542
Reaction score
18,888
Some of you miserable cunts are out of your minds. If right now you think Iowa should win the west every other year, and win the conference every five, when they did that you’d just keep expecting more. I think 9 wins a year, a division title every 4, conference every 12, playoff shot every 12, championship shot…maybe? Truly no expectations on that, 2002 was awesome, but USC showed the difference at the very top. AND I manage to feel happy about the nfl guys too. Find the joy where you can, fellas, the games offer enough misery all by themselves, resenting good stuff isn’t needed.
 

MikeyJoe

has a big head
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
74,325
Reaction score
17,939
I think NFL placement is a horrible measure. I do not care at all about how many players get drafted and it’s not relevant to watching an Iowa game on a college football Saturday. Never once have the Hawkeyes lost and I’ve consoled myself with the likelihood some of the players will he drafted. Also once former Hawkeyes get to the NFL, unless they play for the Raiders, they are dead to me.
If anything the amount of players drafted irritates me that we aren’t better.

If we go 6-6 but have 5 future NFL players in the team,we have succeeded at the level of a six win team. Future draft picks do not retroactively make the team more successful
brantsthankyou.gif
 

Debit One

Chad
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
33,576
Reaction score
23,598
I’ve given up on plumb, dejong, and pretty much colby, but still have some hope for Jones, elsbury, richman, stephens and that red head HaMo likes that for some reason is no longer on the depth chart
I'm pretty much with you on this.

Colby has been horrible this season. Just horrible.

Stephens is the other one where I just don't see it.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
9,743
Reaction score
-2,531
Is that the official statement? If it is, that’s some serious pussy shit. Also suggests that they’re not turning over all of the first team reps to Padilla which seems insane.
very real

It doesn't suggest anything, you're all dumb and don't learn anything.

They may still be retards and play Petras, but you're wasting your time looking at the depth chart. Depth charts reflect the last game, not the next game. For example, Nwankpa was running with the 2s in pregame at OSU and now he's in the depth chart.
 
Top