Gushawk
Likely a Russian Bot Account
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2007
- Messages
- 98,265
- Reaction score
- 38,052
Define “pretty decent”. What kinda curve we gradin on? Big Ten West?Easley should be used to big ten velocity next year. He’s actually pretty decent.
Define “pretty decent”. What kinda curve we gradin on? Big Ten West?Easley should be used to big ten velocity next year. He’s actually pretty decent.
The Alex Hornibrook curveDefine “pretty decent”. What kinda curve we gradin on? Big Ten West?Easley should be used to big ten velocity next year. He’s actually pretty decent.
CalmClam the fuck DOWN!
Velocity. LMAO.Easley should be used to big ten velocity next year. He’s actually pretty decent.
Just wanted to add that there is a slight jump from Newton to IWCC to an arm that would destroy your face even worse than it already is. Easley dropped a lot of catchable balls mainly because they got into him too quick.Velocity. LMAO.Easley should be used to big ten velocity next year. He’s actually pretty decent.
we would have been fucked without him last year.Define “pretty decent”. What kinda curve we gradin on? Big Ten West?Easley should be used to big ten velocity next year. He’s actually pretty decent.
So maybe a 3WR on a team with reasonable recruiting and retention. I can accept that assessmentwe would have been fucked without him last year.Define “pretty decent”. What kinda curve we gradin on? Big Ten West?Easley should be used to big ten velocity next year. He’s actually pretty decent.
Agreed & I think his development will likely indicate how good Copeland is. ISMs development too.Yeah Brandon Smith didn’t show much but at least he played as a true freshman so there is hope he develops into more in year 2.
How dare you.Smith just doesn’t look that fast.
Correct. But ISM is grease lighteningSmith just doesn’t look that fast.
February isn’t usually the time for college football uniform news items, but the Minnesota Gophers came up with a whopper yesterday, as they unveiled a new uni set that includes, as you can see above, an oar-themed helmet stripe and compass-themed helmet numbers. Those are references to Minnesota coach P.J. Fleck’s motivational “Row the boat” mantra (although I’ve never seen a compass on a rowboat), which he came up with during his previous coaching stint at Western Michigan.
“Row the boat” is more than just a coaching philosophy for Fleck — the slogan is rooted in the death of his second son, who had a congenital heart defect and died shortly after birth.
All of which is a powerful and moving story, but it has exactly nothing to do with Minnesota. Putting an oar on the Gophers’ helmets sends the message that the coach is more important than the team. Putting a coach’s slogan on the inner collar (where nobody can see it) or on the nose bumper (where it’s inconspicuous) is one thing, but making it part of the uniform design reflects an upside-down hierarchy of priorities. It was bad enough when Fleck got to dress Western Michigan in oar-themed jerseys. When he inevitably moves on to his next coaching gig, and the one after that, and the one after that, will those schools wear the oar? What if he makes the jump to the NFL — will one of those teams wear the oar?
When the news of this move broke yesterday, Uni Watch reader Kary Klismet posted this in the comments:
[T]aking that phrase from being a form of individual inspiration and shoehorning it onto the uniforms of every football team [Fleck] winds up coaching strikes me as an exercise in personal vanity and selfishness.
I agree, but I’d go a step further: In a world that’s increasingly dominated by the nonsense of “branding,” what we’re seeing here is the ascension of Fleck’s “personal brand.” You can tell that’s how Fleck himself views the situation because he paid Western Michigan for the intellectual property rights to the slogan when he left that school and moved on to Minnesota. It’d be one thing if he wanted to use the slogan as the title of a self-help book, or to sell T-shirts, or to start a rowboat concession down at the lake. But giving his personal brand equal time on the uniform of the of the school he supposedly serves is nuts. It’s the tail wagging the dog, or the boat rowing the oar, or something like that.
All this for a coach who went 5-7 in his first year at Minnesota, and whose lifetime mark is 35-29. I mean, shit, Alabama didn’t wear houndstooth for Bear Bryant until he’d been dead for 27 years.
how much is Wirfs squatting?
Looks like 495.how much is Wirfs squatting?
Trust me, he’s well known by scouts
I deleted this off my phone like two days ago. I used it to DESTROY my dipshit friend who thinks Stanley sucks. Just total WhatsApp carnage!!!!!!@HawkLax6
Is there a graph or chart on Stanleys throws to certain side of the field at given distances?
it's probably in your recently deleted folderI deleted this off my phone like two days ago. I used it to DESTROY my dipshit friend who thinks Stanley sucks. Just total WhatsApp carnage!!!!!!@HawkLax6
Is there a graph or chart on Stanleys throws to certain side of the field at given distances?
I get sickened to see how few PI/holding penalties show up on this.
Probably because that isn't a thing that actually existsAll of you are discounting Kirk QB regression. He will be worse next year.
Except that he did, before he didn'tStanzi Junior Year: 56% completion, 2,400 yards, 17 TDs, 15 INTs (like 6 of which were pick 6s), 131 rating
Stanzi Senior Year: 64% completion, 3,000 yards, 25 TDs, 6 INTs, 157 rating.
Clearly a QB who regressed
People talked about it after Tate, but for some reason this really became a thing with Iowa fan Stanzi's senior year which was dumb as shit. "He's not clutch anymore!"The narrative exists because the teams got worse/less lucky in close games from one year to the next and people assume wins and losses are 100% on the QB for some reason
One might add that Tate also no longer had Solomon and Hinkel.When people talk about Stanzi regressing they don't mean from 08 to 09 you dummy, and he was more or less the same guy anyway.
Tate had better numbers his junior year than his sophomore year. He sucked as a senior because he fucked up his shoulder.
Vandenberg lost the best receiver in school history and got thrown into a completely new shitty offense but he'd be the rare example of this actually being true, sure
The narrative exists because the teams got worse/less lucky in close games from one year to the next and people assume wins and losses are 100% on the QB for some reason
yeah but has Iowa ever won more games than the year before with a returning starter?Probably because that isn't a thing that actually existsAll of you are discounting Kirk QB regression. He will be worse next year.
Yes. They won more games in 2009 than in 2008.yeah but has Iowa ever won more games than the year before with a returning starter?Probably because that isn't a thing that actually existsAll of you are discounting Kirk QB regression. He will be worse next year.
I think this is only really true since McNutt graduated and we replaced KOK with Davis. Before that we were mostly fine outside of some down periods where everyone got hurt like 03, or when the whole City Boyz Inc mess blew up and we lost a bunch of promising guys all at once. It wasnt always spectacular but it wasnt the outright disaster it's been latelyWhen the one constant of the Kirk era has been struggling to get wideouts, it might be reasonable to include who they are throwing to in the tate got worse/ vandy got worse discussions